Bob Bernick's Notebook: Ghost of HB477 Still Haunts Legislature
by Bob Bernick
08/24/2012 | 1147 views | 3 3 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Bob Bernick, Utah Policy Contributing Editor
Bob Bernick, Utah Policy Contributing Editor
slideshow
A vote this week by top Utah legislative leaders on a GRAMA-related issue shows that legislators will hang tough on making individuals and groups the bosses believe are gaming the public records law pay big for the right to use the open-government act, even without HB477.

By a 3-1 vote, with House Minority Leader David Litvack, D-Salt Lake, siding with two Republicans, the Legislature’s Record Committee voted to make the state Democratic Party pay just over $9,000 more to get the last two boxes of their 2011 redistricting records request.

Democrats say they won’t pay the money – even though they could – and they say they won’t take up the offer by the Utah Republican Party to pay the $9,000 for them, either.

Instead, the Democrats may go to court to try to get the fee waiver, obtain the documents and make them public.

In any case, the Democrats will use the refusal to bring up the specter of HB477 and the “evil” legislative Republicans who pushed that failed GRAMA rewrite through the 2011 Legislature.

And Democrats will use the 3-1 vote as campaign fodder this year in attempts to get Utahns to split-ticket their ballots.

Democrats know that most Utahns will be voting for Mitt Romney for president – the fellow Mormon and 2002 Winter Games beloved boss.

To avoid a down-ticket landslide, Utah Democrats need voters to cast ballots for Democratic candidates in state, legislative and county races.

Maybe, just maybe, the GRAMA redistricting vote made Monday could help in that effort.

State Democratic Party leaders are hoping for some free media down the road as they try to keep the GRAMA redistricting records’ decisions in the public eye.

A court suit, filed just before the November election (but really going nowhere legally) would be one way to do that.

A Tuesday UPD story details why Litvack and the two GOP leaders – President Michael Waddoups, R-Taylorsville; and House Speaker Becky Lockhart, R-Provo; voted the way they did. And why Senate Minority Leader Ross Romero, D-Salt Lake, voted to give the state Democrats their fee waiver.

You can read the story here.

One of the complaints GOP legislators made last year in passing HB477 – which made a number of changes to GRAMA and was opposed by good-government and media folks alike – was that with a relatively small staff the Legislature couldn’t meet often broad-based requests for documents.

Indeed, it was brought up again in Monday’s hearing that it took 500 hours of staff time to compile all the redistricting documents the Utah Democratic Party asked for.

Robert Reese, the legislative staff attorney who worked on the request, said that staff leaders underestimated the real cost of the request, and still came up with nearly $15,000 overall.

The Democrats paid $5,000 this spring. But when they came to pick up their request, they were allowed to only pick up the first box of records.

When opened and examined by Democrats, and by a Salt Lake Tribune reporter, it contained emails, maps and other material that had already been made public on the Legislature’s redistricting online site.

The Democrats asked for the other two boxes to be released and for their $5,000 back.

They’ve gotten neither. And it looks like they won’t get the additional records unless they pay the remained of their GRAMA bill.

In addition, two news organizations have filed subsequent GRAMA requests asking for the two remaining boxes – with the argument that because they are not a partisan organization they should get a fee waiver based on public interest.

But they haven’t gotten the final two boxes, either.

And Reese said Monday in his testimony that legislative staffers and the Legislature probably need to make some kind of law/rule on whether to give away, for free, GRAMA-generated material to the media.

Finally – and this was an interesting tidbit to me – the four-member committee swore in the Democrats’ witnesses, and three other folks who wanted to address the committee.

A special note was made that if the sworn person didn’t “tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth,” they could be found guilty of a Class B Misdemeanor.

But the four legislators on the committee weren’t sworn in. And staffer Reese, who also testified before the committee, wasn’t sworn in, either.

So only legislators and their staff were free to lie, if they wanted to.

Utah State Republican Party Chairman Thomas Wright was sworn in and preceded to call Democrats about every name in the book and question their motives.

But he wasn’t stopped by Waddoups, who was chairing the meeting.

So it appears that swearing someone in before a legislative committee doesn’t necessarily lead to good manners or accurate statements – all opinions are allowed.

That’s fine, but what’s the point of swearing someone in, other than trying to intimidate them?

In any case, legislative leaders seem determined to make folks pay for large GRAMA requests made of the Legislature.

That could, depending on the individual requests, dampen the public’s right to know what their lawmakers are doing.

And it appears the media – yours truly included – can’t try to game the system by following up with a GRAMA request exactly like the original one to get information for free.

That, likewise, may harm the public’s right to know.

It looks as if the ghost of HB477 still hangs over the Utah Legislature.

As it turns out, there’s still reason for concern about the legislative branch of government’s attitude about open records, their cost and their availability to the public.
Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
|
September 01, 2012
Hey Publius3000, when you say "As I understand it, this meeting was like a hearing", are you saying "only legislators and their staff were free to lie" is incorrect, or are you saying that going out of the way to specially note during a swearing-in that a violation is a Class B Misdemeanor is somehow not an act of intimidation, when such special notes are not usually made?

Even if you claim the lawmakers faced the same Class B Misdemeanors as anyone else without a need for being sworn-in, you are wrong when you claim this somehow diminishes the the rest of the article.
|
August 24, 2012
While the main thrust of this article is part of an important debate, the arguments about swearing in of witnesses make little sense and diminish the strength of your overall argument. As I understand it, this meeting was like a hearing with the legislative committee as the triers of fact and staff counsel operating as attorneys representing the legislature. In a court, the judge isn't sworn in, nor is counsel. (Was the attorney representing the Democratic Party sworn in? That isn't clear in this article. Of course, counsel are under a consistent obligation to tell the truth because they are members of the bar and, in a judicial setting, are officers of the court.) And when has the swearing in process ever guaranteed "good manners." A judge may attempt to enforce good manners in a court room, but the swearing in of witnesses isn't the key to that. In fact, if you felt one witness was out-of-line, it may demonstrate being sworn in isn't as intimidating as you imply.
|
August 24, 2012
"The ghost of HB477" nice line, sounds familiar.
today's headlines
Local Headlines
May 19, 2013 | 15836 views | 0 0 comments | 1 1 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Salt Lake Tribune

Op-ed: Special prosecutor needed

Op-ed: SLCC's role in small business

Paul Rolly: Will Mia Love learn from past errors?

Editorial: Fighting the feds: Law antagonizes officers doing a job

Editorial: Drinking drivers: Lower threshold not best deterrent

Editorial: No solution: An appointed A.G. no improvement

High-risk Utahns' health insurance will shift to federal management

Confusion lingers in Utah over teen access to 'morning after pill'

In surprise to the NSA, Utah Data Center may pay tax on electricity

Utah gun sales, permits triple since Sandy Hook

Q&A: Utah teachers and guns in schools

Gun-toting Utah teachers to parents: Your kids are safe with us

Hatch has plan to attack public-lands pot farms

D.C. Notebook: Huntsman: 'Political extremism' prompts scandals

Utah GOP again rejects reforms to nomination process

Deseret News

Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: How will these national scandals affect Utah politics?

John Florez: Involve the poor in solving poverty

Democrats call for legislative hearings into state executive scandals

Utah added 43,000 more jobs in April 2013 compared to April 2012

Utah facing $1.2 billion-dollar water pollution problem

Mia Love announces she's officially running against Matheson — again

GOP delegates reject changes to nominating system; petition drive coming next?

Airport TRAX ridership remains strong weeks after official opening

Other

Op-ed: Common Core poses 'real threat' of loss of privacy (Daily Herald)

Op-ed: Common Core standards better than what Utah has now (Daily Herald)

GOP delegates keep system as is; Love announces candidacy (Daily Herald)

Editorial: Don't make AG an appointment (Standard-Examiner)

Editorial: IRS bullying disgraceful (Standard-Examiner)

W. Davis corridor dispute rages on in Farmington, Kaysville (Standard-Examiner)

Weber State shows off to Regents (Standard-Examiner)

Layton leaders reluctant to embrace voting by mail (Standard-Examiner)

Councilwoman wants to be Bountiful's first female mayor (Standard-Examiner)

County Councilman Craig Petersen announces run for Logan mayor (Logan Herald Journal)

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
utah tweets
RSS Feeds
Utah policy stories feed
Policy buzz feed
Daily news highlights feed
Washington watch feed

With support from PinPointInternetMarketing.com