Utah Policy Daily is a free newsletter published business days by Utah Policy.com.
Send us your comments and ideas. See our Policy Daily Archive. Please forward this to friends.


Today's political briefing:
Key developments and analysis for Utah policymakers

Subscribe or Unsubscribe
Email:

Message Center
(Links to Advertisements, Advertorials, Sponsored Articles, and Client Advocacy Essays published to defray the cost of producing Utah Policy Daily.)

Advocacy Essay: The credit union political fight: What it’s really all about

News Highlights

Rocky Anderson, Dave Buhler trade jabs over state-of-city speech that angered northern Utah residents and Anderson says Republican Party is extremist and has abused the state (Salt Lake Tribune and Deseret Morning News).

Huntsman administration sacking of economic development executives angers citizens’ board overseeing the department (Morning News) and Huntsman plans more major shakeups in state government (Tribune and Morning News).

Legislation is drafted requiring every bill to include a “Family Impact Statement” (Tribune).


Quote of the Day

" . . . there's an arrogance of power that needs to be corrected. We are very much committed to economic development, but it feels like we're not in a political administration. We're in a regime that feels they can do whatever they like, contrary to the law."

Dell Loy Hansen, vice chair of the state economic development citizens’ board, regarding the firing of state economic development executives (Deseret Morning News).


Friday Buzz
Compiled and Written by LaVarr Webb

Leaders Outline Priorities

Utah’s top two legislative leaders joked with each other, discussed legislative agendas, and pledged cooperation with Gov. Jon Huntsman at a Republican Party breakfast fundraiser Thursday in Little America Hotel.

House Speaker Greg Curtis and Senate President John Valentine identified transportation as a top priority for the session that starts Monday. Valentine said having higher revenue numbers is both good news and bad news. Lawmakers can start to make up for the last several tight years, but more money creates higher expectations and every entity and interest group wants a share of it.

The focus will be on funding the basics, Valentine said, including transportation, public education, higher education and public employee compensation. Both leaders said little appetite exists for any tax hike that results in a net revenue increase. Curtis said he doubts a gas tax increase will pass, but instead the House is interested in devoting $85 million from the general fund to transportation.

He identified the Centennial Highway projects, Legacy Parkway, I-15 in Utah County, and the Mountain View Corridor as priorities for transportation funding. In making transportation a top priority, legislators have the solid support of the Salt Lake Chamber, other business associations, and many individual businesses and individuals.

Tax reform, a high priority for Gov. Huntsman, will be considered, Curtis said, but highly controversial reform will probably need further study before the Legislature will act.


Sponsored Article
Paper Tiger, Toothless Snarl

By LaVarr Webb
      With a new legislative session beginning Monday, Utah’s mega-credit union lobbyists and PR operatives are employing a highly interesting strategy. It might be called the “make legislators really angry” strategy.
       In my years of watching Utah’s lawmakers in action, I admit I’ve never seen such a strategy work. But perhaps the lobbyists/PR/advertising gurus retained by the billion dollar CUs are way smarter than me. It could be something really subtle: Make ‘em mad, say you’re sorry and make up. And, voila, they’ll vote your way.
       Otherwise, why would these operatives have mounted a whiny saturation radio campaign that dramatically escalates this matter when lawmakers made it perfectly clear they want to address this issue on its policy merits and avoid a big, nasty media shooting war.
       If these strategists aren’t simply brilliant, why would they publicly attack prominent lawmakers serving on the Legislature’s Financial Institution’s Task Force? Particularly after the credit unions themselves asked for the task force, and then contributed nothing during a two-year study period.
       Could it be that instead of deploying smart strategy, the mega-credit union lobbyists and strategists are simply desperate? They keep losing on the merits of their policy positions, so they resort to the only thing they can do—lash out politically. Like a wounded animal backed into a corner, they snarl and spit and try to intimidate.
       Trouble is, their tactics are growing tiresome for legislators, especially because despite the bluster and swagger they have been shown to be a toothless, paper tiger. They end each fight with a lot of whimpering and whining.
       Time after time, when it comes down to a fair and unbiased decision by a common-sense judge, knowledgeable lawmakers or expert regulators, they lose. They even lose with their own members, who overwhelmingly believe that profits retained by the big credit unions and not returned to members should be taxed.
       Consider their track record: They have lost in state courts. They recently lost a big case in federal court. They have lost before regulators. They lost in the legislative fights of 2001 and 2003. They lost before the Financial Institutions Task Force. They lost several seats in the last election. They lost in the gubernatorial election. They lost in the leadership races. They just tried to get the Financial Institutions commissioner fired – and lost.
       So they resort to old-fashioned power politics with a big media buy and nasty newsletters and Web site postings quoting scripture and name-calling (all bankers are “greedy dogs”).
       Here’s the fundamental (and enormous) problem the mega-credit unions have: Their basic position is simply untenable and unsustainable. In this country we don’t allow gigantic, wealthy businesses that show none of the characteristics of a charitable institution, to avoid paying taxes. We don’t keep subsidizing a welfare mother if she becomes rich. People instinctively know that taxpayers shouldn’t subsidize billion-dollar credit unions that want to make multi-million dollar loans to wealthy developers so they can build expensive homes for rich people. It simply makes no sense, but that’s what the big credit unions want to do. (Small, traditional credit unions, by contrast, should be allowed to keep their tax exemption.)
       And so, it shouldn’t be a surprise that in every public policy forum where these issues are raised before objective, knowledgeable, fair-minded decision-makers, the credit union operatives lose.
       In private conversations, credit union insiders even admit they know their position is untenable and sooner or later their profits will be taxed. They simply want to hold out as long as they can to grow as large as possible before the government gets wise about their abuse of the tax subsidy.
       And it shouldn’t be any surprise that, given their shaky position, the CU lobbyists are lashing out, running whiny radio ads about the mean banks and the Council for Sound Tax Policy (CSTP), which is focused on the big credit unions’ eroding the tax base.
       The problem with attacking CSTP is that while it has received seed money from the banking industry, its membership really is made up of local government leaders, education supporters, and small business people who don’t care a hoot about the banks, but really are concerned about the rapid erosion of the tax base as the big credit unions grow aggressively.
       Perhaps credit union members should begin to question the wisdom of allowing their money to be spent on big, costly media blitzes that do nothing but make legislators mad and contribute nothing to the public policy debate.
       The banks have long recognized that this has really become a federal issue. That’s why they support HJR1, which simply restates Utah’s existing policy (which was supported by the credit unions) and asks Congress to reexamine federal policy and differentiate between real credit unions and mega-credit unions.
       (Article sponsored by the Exoro Group.)


 

Friday
January 14, 2005

Salt Lake Tribune
- Huntsman plans big shake-up
- Tuition tax-credit bill gets retooled
- Lawmaker: Sales tax hike an option to pay for water pipeline to St. George
- Housing authority plugs hole in budget
- Hatch vows increase for deceased vets' families
- Bills could analyze 'family impact'
- Disaster relief fund a possibility
- County is sued over access to report
- Chemical weapons could be shipped to Utah
- Anderson, Buhler get testy at SLC meeting
- Huntsman gets good report on economy
- Editorial: Meeting the standard
- Editorial: Follow the money

Standard-Examiner
- Huntsman sees strong economy
- Tax group questions levy for operation of recreation facility
- Editorial: Try meeting at night, Davis

St. George Spectrum
- Make voices heard about nuclear waste

Daily Herald
- White House adviser speaks at UVSC

Deseret Morning News
- Utah to 'revitalize'
- Huntsman's action called 'arrogance of power'
-
Seat-belt law proponent biding time
-
Rocky blasts 'extremist' GOP
-
'Hot' speeches lauded
-
Chemical arms to be relocated to Utah?
-
Huntsman plans to restructure state offices
-
Did would-be Huntsman aide yield to critics?
-
Bob Bernick Jr.: Legislature has nearly $600 million to spend — on what?
-
Editorial: Pass a hate-crimes law


News Notes

Department of Redundancy Department

A headline link I found in the New York Times on-line edition:

"All the President's Newsmen. On 'Crossfire,' the hosts lob softballs at a man who may have been a cog in illegal government wrongdoing."


A Balanced Transportation System

Watch Sunday's Salt Lake papers for a large ad making the case for a balanced regional transportation system. Sponsored by Envision Utah, the ad complements the radio and TV spots that have been running.

Envision Utah Executive Director Alan Matheson said the ad gives local elected officials credit for having developed a solution to the region's mobility challenges that includes highways, roads, commuter rail, light rail expansion, and bus rapid transit. The ad also encourages readers to watch Envision Utah's documentary on the same topic at 11:30 a.m. or 4:00 p.m. on KSL TV on Sunday. The documentary does not advocate for or against specific legislation, or endorse any particular transportation projects or funding packages, Matheson said, just the need for an efficient regional transportation system. The documentary includes Sandy Mayor Tom Dolan listing projects recommended by the Wasatch Front Regional Council and Mountainland Association of Governments.

My impression is that Envision Utah has done a nice job making the case for a major transportation initiative and is supporting a balanced approach, not singling out transit for support. The Envision Utah ads even support the Legacy Parkway. For more information, visit www.envisionutah.org.


Reader Response

Thanks to Rep. Kory Holdaway for a nice missive: “Just a quick note to say thank you for your efforts to pull together in one spot all the news stories dealing with Utah policies and politics. I continue to find your efforts very helpful and informative. As the legislative session approaches your web site will become increasingly important.”


Political Calendar

Please submit calendar items to Daily@UtahPolicy.com

- Jan 14: Cache County Democrats Big CD Party, 6:30 pm, Christine and Nathan Hult’s, 2735 N 1250 E, North Logan. For more information contact Joyce Howell at 435-752-9214.
- Jan 15: Utah Democratic Party Legislative Ball 2005, 6 pm to 11 pm, Marriott Hotel Downtown, 75 S West Temple, Salt Lake City.
- Jan 17: 2005 legislative session begins.
- Jan 19:  "Left, Right...Which Way America?"  A one-hour discussion between Adrian Wooldridge (author of The Right Nation) and Robert Reich (author of Reason: Why Liberals Will Win the Battle for America), 6 pm. KCPW is heard at 88. FM, 105.3 FM and 1010 AM.
- Jan 20: Presidential Inauguration.
- Jan 20: Live Coverage of President Bush Inauguration, 9:30 am.  KCPW is heard at 88. FM, 105.3 FM and 1010 AM.
- Jan 27: Last day to request bills (by noon).
- Jan 27: Last day to approve bills for numbering (by noon).
- Jan 29: Central Committee Meeting.
- Jan 31: Utah Issues 31st Citizen’s Day at the Legislature, 8:30am to 1:30 pm, Prime Hotel, 215 W South Temple, Salt Lake City. Free event with breakfast and lunch provided. For more information please visit www.utahissues.org.
- Feb 3: Salt Lake Chamber’s Annual Legislative Reception, 5:30 pm to 8 pm, Grand America Hotel.
- Feb 5: Annual Green Party of Utah Convention, 10 am to 2 pm, Anderson-Foothill Library, 1135 E 2100 S, Salt Lake City.
- Feb 12: Morgan County Lincoln Day Dinner.
- Feb 12: Utah County Lincoln Day Dinner.
- Feb 18: Last day for legislators to prioritize bills and other programs with fiscal impact.
- Feb 23: Final meeting for the Executive Appropriations Committee on all budget matters.
- Feb. 25: Massachusetts Gov. and 2008 presidential hopeful Mitt Romney speaks at Salt Lake County Republican Lincoln Day Dinner, 7 p.m., Little America Hotel. For ticket information see: www.lincolnclub.net.
- Feb 25:  Salt Lake County Lincoln Day Dinner.
- Feb 25: Bonding bill available to legislators by noon and final action taken on it by calendared closing time.
- Feb 25: Last day to pass bills with fiscal note of $10,000 or more.
- Feb 26: Republican Women Federation Fundraiser.
- Feb 27: Last day to consider bills from own house.
- Feb 27: Last day for a motion to reconsider.

- See the entire calendar

Elected Officials Birthday List


Utah Policy Daily is a service
of Utah Policy.com

Publisher: LaVarr Webb
Editor: Paul Hollingshead
News: Golden Webb
Calendar and Subscriptions: Luci Webb