Today's political briefing: Key developments
and analysis for Utah policymakers
Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Message Center

(Announcements, Advertisements, Advertorials, and Sponsored Articles.)

Transportation Watch

How We Grow Affects How We Travel

Traffic congestion has been a prime topic of discussion in Utah in recent months, highlighted by the state legislature’s record funding for new roads. The legislature, in special session earlier this year, also authorized counties to hold elections to raise sales taxes to fund "regionally significant transportation projects."

A big reason for our transportation woes is because of the rate at which we are growing, and maybe more significantly, how we are growing -- where we put new homes, businesses and shopping centers, and what it then requires to get around to all these far-flung places.

(See full article below)



 

News Highlights

Utah economy expected to slow but stay healthy (Deseret Morning News).

Van Turner selected as chair of the Salt Lake City Council, with Jill Remington Love as vice chairwoman (Deseret Morning News).

Nearly 6,300 acres designated as critical habitat for two endangered plants in S Utah and N Arizona (Salt Lake Tribune).

Quote of the Day

"Utah's leading economic indicator, from a survey of supply managers and business leaders, points to healthy but slower growth in the months ahead,"

- Ernie Goss, a Creighton University economics professor, in a report about Utah’s economy (Deseret Morning News).


 
Wednesday Buzz
Written by LaVarr Webb & Associates

Today in History

Jan. 3, 1989: Unsuccessful 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis announces he will not run for a fourth term as governor of Massachusetts. (Source: National Journal 2007 calendar of American politics)

Wise Words
"A Bible and a newspaper in every house, a good school in every district ... are the principle support of virtue, morality and civil liberty."

-- Benjamin Franklin (Source: Eigen’s Political Quotes)

2007 Mayoral Analysis

Salt Lake City Tough for GOP

By James Seaman

Looking toward Salt Lake City’s 2007 mayoral contest, the results of our most recent election may help illuminate a seemingly clouded picture. After consecutive mayoral elections in which two Democrats faced off, Republicans are eager to earn a spot on the final ballot eleven months from now. Examining the breakdown of voting preferences among Salt Lakers in 2006, however, demonstrates the tough task Republicans face, at least on paper.

Let’s assume that Ralph Becker, Dave Buhler, Keith Christensen, Megan Holbrook, Nancy Saxton and Jenny Wilson are the main contestants for the city’s top job. If 2007 voting trends mimic those of 2006, Democratic voters could split evenly among their four candidates and still have a fair chance of winning the top two spots. That’s because Democratic performance in Salt Lake City in the 2006 election averaged 70%.

If voter turnout matches that of the 1999 Mayoral primary, we can expect close to 37% of Salt Lake City’s 97,507 registered voters to make an appearance at the polls in October. Using 2006 as a guideline, 70% Democratic performance would mean 25,064 votes. If those electors were to divide evenly among the four Democratic candidates (Becker, Holbrook, Saxton and Wilson), each hopeful would come away with nearly 6,300 votes. If 2006 Republican voters, in turn, split between Buhler and Christensen, each would have 5,400 votes. Since the top two primary vote-getters advance to the general, regardless of party affiliation, such a scenario would ensure two Democratic finalists. Of course, votes are not likely to be split in such an even manner. Even so, this hypothetical situation illustrates the uphill battle that Republicans face in Salt Lake City.

Another way of thinking about the Republican predicament is to use the 1999 primary as a comparison. That year, a crowded field of 11 candidates vied for DeeDee Corradini’s soon-to-be vacant office. The second place finisher--Stewart Reid--earned 19.5% of the vote. If we assume a candidate needs 20% to earn a second place finish, and Republican performance citywide hovers around 30%, the top Republican would need two-thirds of his party’s votes in order to advance. This leaves Dave Buhler and Keith Christensen fighting over the same precarious perch, each candidate knowing he must wallop the other in order to procure enough Republican votes to survive and advance. With more candidates, the Democratic bloodbath promises to provide even more carnage. Yet enjoying more than a two-to-one advantage in party performance means that Democrats can split their votes four ways and still potentially send two finalists into November.

Republican candidates may, of course, position themselves as moderates and attempt to siphon enough Democratic votes to cross the 20% threshold and potentially achieve a top two finish. Such a strategy, however, might also make a moderate Republican vulnerable if his fellow party member stays to the right and collects an overwhelming majority of Republican votes.

Assuming that a Republican advances to the final election, winning becomes even more difficult. Knowing that 30% of Salt Lake City voters cast straight Democratic tickets in 2006 (as opposed to 11% of city residents going straight Republican) means only 59% of the field is actually contested. While the mayor’s race is non-partisan, those who vote straight-party in federal races and state races are unlikely to switch parties for a municipal contest. In a general election, with 30% of voters solidly Democratic and a base of just 11%, a Republican would have only 59% of the electorate from which to climb out of a nearly three-to-one deficit. In other words, with little more than 21,000 votes left up for grabs, a Republican would have to capture almost 14,000 of them–two of every three–in order to achieve the nearly 18,000 votes necessary to win.

Taking a closer look at the 59% of non straight-party voters, Democratic performance among the group was 68% in 2006. If a Republican candidate in the final election were to retain 100% of the city residents who voted Republican in 2006 (with turnout adjusted for a municipal election), he would still be over 7,000 votes short of surpassing 50%. Assuming all straight-party Democrats stay to the left, a Republican would have approximately 14,300 Democratic-leaning voters from which to cull the remaining 7,160 votes necessary for victory. To put things more simply, if Republicans secure their entire straight-party base along with every voter who leans Republican, and Democrats retain their straight-party loyalists, a Republican candidate must still capture 50% of Democratic-leaning voters in Salt Lake City.

Of course, municipal races are less partisan than general election contests, and upsets happen in politics. Both Buhler and Christensen have won council races in the city. Compelling candidates have the ability to transcend the bounds of party loyalty. The numbers tell us that it will take just such a candidate if a Republican hopes to win Salt Lake City’s top job in 2007.

Blog Watch
Democracy for Utah argues: "The free market is simply a bad fit for healthcare (also see here and here). Insurance companies have figured out that they can maximize their profits by insuring only healthy people, thus collecting lots of revenue in insurance premiums while paying out very little in claims." Paul Allen talks football: "I believe it is inevitable – manifest destiny if you will – that there will eventually be some kind of national playoff and legitimate national championship game in Division I college football. We can’t continue to pretend forever that the BCS bowl series is legitimate or fair. I don’t think it will last too many more years." Lincoln Shurtz looks at key legislative issues for Utah in 2007. Utah Taxpayers Association talks about taxing outputs, not inputs.

 

 

Wednesday
January 3, 2007


Utah in the National News

NY Times Article: "The new Democratic majority, in the first months of the new Congress, is expected to take up a bill that would increase the voting membership of the House from 435 to 437, giving new vote each to Utah, a Republican stronghold, and the District of Columbia, dominated by Democrats."

Regional Headlines
Screening for Nevada Downwinders
Article: "After years of downplaying the hazards posed by atmospheric nuclear testing, the federal government is actively reaching out to Eastern Nevada's downwinders. ... The year-old Nevada Radiation Exposure Screening and Education Program (RESEP) was created with the goal of reaching every eligible state resident affected by atmospheric nuclear testing at the Nevada Test Site" (Ely Times).

Managing Lake Mead
Series of articles looks at the public policy issues surrounding the management of a shrinking Lake Mead (Las Vegas Sun and Vegas Sun).

How Colorado Turned Blue
Op-ed writer Mark Hillman: "What a difference eight years makes -- or even four, for that matter. Bill Ritter's inauguration as governor on Jan. 9 marks a milestone in a political transformation that seemed unlikely, if not virtually impossible, just a few years ago. Hand it to Colorado Democrats: They've done a remarkable job turning our state's political landscape upside down, despite trailing Republicans in voter registration by some 170,000" (Rocky Mountain News).


Local Headlines

 

Deseret Morning News
- '07 Utah economy slower but healthy
- 2 vie for Provo House seat
- Utes to vote Thursday on tribal financial issues
- Salt Lake Council hashing out housing policy
- City Council chooses leadership
- Utah County officials are sworn in
- New team takes reins in Salt Lake County
- Outgoing official is arrested in Dixie
- Herbert's home on past-due tax list
- Ex-chief of staff mulls run for office
- 10 apply for vacancy on Orem City Council

Salt Lake Tribune
- Flower species wins fed habitat
- City expands list of potential uses
- Buhman, Anderson high-profile newcomers
- City moves to take possession of pond
- U. seeks support for gun control
- New, old faces take the oath
- 2 tied for Provo's GOP replacement
- New D.A. vows to build trust
- SLC debates housing policies
- Two new commissioners cast first votes
- SLC Council elects new leaders

Daily Herald
- Orem teen going to China for stem cell treatment
- Orem business incubator seeks start-ups
- Elected Utah County officials take office
- Governor will make final choice for Dist. 62

The Spectrum
- County officials sworn in
- Women take office

Park Record
- Housing dearth in Snyderville

Davis County Clipper
- Motorists may pay to drive Legacy
- Davis commissioners raise last gavel
- Land buy turns trailhead park into reality
- County tax hike approved
- County budget: Action on Tuesday?
- Watchdog opposes tax hike
- Bishop: Iraq still big question mark


Political Calendar

Please submit calendar items to Daily@UtahPolicy.com

- Jan 3: Midday Metro at 10 a.m. on NPR Utah, KCPW 88.3 FM, features a year-end real estate report from Darrell Tate and Mike Richmond of Commerce CRG; Dr. James Carlisle of University Health Care and HHT Foundation president Charles Abbott talk about genetic blood vessel disorders; and Midday Metro checks in with Jordan River Bird Count Coordinator Jeanne LeBer and Nathan Darnall, president of the Great Salt Lake Audobon Society’s Executive Board. To participate, email midday@kcpw.org during the show.
- Jan 3: RadioWest on KUER FM 90: "Newspapers in a New Media Age," 11 a.m. and 7 p.m. In Holly Mullen's farewell column in the December 21st Salt Lake Tribune, she cited transitions in the newspaper industry as her reason for leaving the paper. Doug talks to Mullen about what she's learned about newspapers and readers in her five years as a Tribune columnist.
- Jan 4: Gov. Huntsman to attend the Wasatch Economic Development Forum, 9 a.m., University Marriott Hotel, Salt Lake City.
- Jan 4: Open House Media Event for JP Hughes,MD as he announces his candidacy for SLC Mayor 2008, begins at 11 a.m. with the announcement at noon, Hughes residence, 137 N. West Temple, Salt Lake City.
- Jan 4: Professional Republican Women (PRW) luncheon meeting, Panache Private Club, 2nd Floor, Wells Fargo Building, 299 S. Main. Featured guest speaker will be Dr. Quin Monson, Assistant Professor, Political Science, BYU. Socializing begins at 11:30 a.m. with lunch at 12 noon; $20 for members, $25 for guests. RSVP to Melanie Rogers at 801- 891-6926 or e-mail melmrogers@yahoo.com.
- Jan 4: Davis County Democrats Planning Committee Meeting, 7 p.m., Commissioner's Chambers, Davis Courthouse, Farmington.
- Jan 4: Governor's Science & Technology Medal Awards Ceremony, 7 p.m., Utah Natural History Museum.
- Jan 5: Medicaid Interim Committee, 8:30 a.m., room W135.
- Jan 5: Gov. Huntsman to give welcoming Remarks at Utah Emergency Management Association, 9 a.m., South Towne Exposition Center.
- Jan 5: Senate Rules Committee, 3 p.m., room W110.
- Jan 9: United Way of Salt Lake third annual Legislative Preview Breakfast, 7:30 a.m., Salt Lake City Marriott Downtown. For more information, please contact Bryson Despain at 801-736-7709.
- Jan 9: Utah State Senate Majority annual leadership breakfast, 7:30 a.m., Grand America Hotel. For more information contact Ric Cantrell 801-673-1603.
- Jan 10: Legislative meetings scheduled throughout day. See legislative calendar for details.

- See the entire calendar


Elected Officials Birthday List


Utah Policy Daily is a service
of Utah Policy.com

Publisher: LaVarr Webb
Editor: Paul Hollingshead
News: Golden Webb
Calendar and Subscriptions: Luci Hollingshead

 

Utah Policy Daily
American Plaza III, Suite 105
47 West 200 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
801.537.0900 Office
801.537.0901 Fax

 

Special E-Mail Messages: Utah Policy Daily may send subscribers e-mails with information about new features, special offers, or messages on public policy issues from clients and advertisers. If you do not wish to ever receive these e-mails, please let us know by e-mail at daily@utahpolicy.com.




 

 

 


Feature Story


How We Grow Affects How We Travel
By Wilf Sommerkorn

Traffic congestion has been a prime topic of discussion in Utah in recent months, highlighted by the state legislature’s record funding for new roads. The legislature, in special session earlier this year, also authorized counties to hold elections to raise sales taxes to fund "regionally significant transportation projects."

A big reason for our transportation woes is because of the rate at which we are growing, and maybe more significantly, how we are growing -- where we put new homes, businesses and shopping centers, and what it then requires to get around to all these far-flung places.

A rather remarkable process is taking place right now in planning for our transportation future. The Wasatch Front Regional Council and the Mountainland Association of Governments, the bodies tasked with developing a long range plan for transportation for the metropolitan area from Payson to North Ogden, are for the first time creating that plan by considering alternative land use patterns. They are being assisted by Envision Utah, an organization that has done much in recent years to help promote the understanding of better ways to grow to help us keep our quality of life.

Envision Utah, under a contract with WFRC and MAG, has produced a new document, Wasatch Choices 2040, which proposes alternate land-use scenarios. This document will form the basis for the new plan.

This is a change because traditionally, responsibility for the two areas — transportation and land use — has been separated. Regional transportation has been a state and regional responsibility, while land use has been the province of cities and counties. Generally, there has been little coordination between the two.

The connection between land use and transportation has been an obvious one for planners and transportation experts for some time. The connection is intuitive — the way we travel depends on where we live and where we work. In recent years, there has been some grousing about the lack of communication in, say, where a shopping center is planned by a city and where UDOT has been planning major roadway improvements. Such a lack of coordination can quickly erode the capacity of a highway to carry anticipated traffic.

The effect of land use on transportation is clearly demonstrated in a study by the Victoria Transport Policy Institute. It notes, for example, that per capita automobile travel tends to decline with increasing population and employment density, particularly if clustered into compact centers.

Other important relationships: per capita automobile travel tends to decline with increased land use mix, such as when commercial and public services are located within or adjacent to residential areas. Per capita automobile travel tends to decline in areas with connected street networks, like grid and modified grid patterns. Larger and higher-density commercial centers tend to have lower rates of automobile commuting because they tend to support better travel choices (more transit, ridesharing, better pedestrian facilities, etc.) and amenities such as cafes and shops, although they may increase average commute distances.

Knowing these kinds of relationships is important at a time when we are becoming increasingly concerned about growth and the ability of our transportation systems to keep up. Interestingly, it appears that we are increasing our miles traveled much faster than the rate of population growth. How can this be? It happens in part because of our patterns of development — homes in the suburbs far from jobs and shopping (often located in different suburbs), requiring us to drive more. If we could find ways to put people closer to those destinations …. Obviously, land use does affect transportation.

The Transportation and Growth Management Program of the Oregon Department of Transportation notes in a brief, The Transportation-Land Use Connection, that "the layout and design of land uses affects the choice of mode of travel. Often, development patterns isolate various land uses, such as residential, office, and retail land uses." Low-density commercial and residential developments have the following problems:

  • Large lots and low density discourage walking and bicycling
  • Street layout funnels traffic onto major arterials, causing congestion on major streets
  • Roads are designed for mobility of cars as opposed to accessibility for all modes
  • Buildings set far apart by vast parking areas and wide access roads discourage walking between uses
  • Community development codes usually include neighborhood street layout and design standards that only conform to the automobile

Part of the disconnect between our land uses and our major transportation networks has been that our city councils and planning commissions are responsible for approving new development, while the planning of the transportation system is a state and regional responsibility. The recent crises to find the funds to pay for the necessary transportation improvements has caused us to look at ways other than just building new roads, such as is there a way to slow down the growth in vehicle miles traveled? Can we put places where people live and where they work closer together, to minimize travel, for example?

What the new long-range transportation plan for our region will show us is, if we change the way we grow and develop, we may also change and improve the way we travel, and save money in the long run. The trick will be to get all those individual cities and counties to acknowledge the relationship and make changes to their local zoning and development codes to accomplish what should be so obvious.

Wilf Sommerkorn is Director of the Davis County Department of Community & Economic Development, and serves as Chair of the Ogden-Layton Technical Subcommittee of the WFRC Regional Growth Committee

 

 
 

On the Move

Links to the Week's Key Transportation News Stories

-- Improvements Coming for Canyon Road (KSL).

-- Higher tolls for busy roads? (Salt Lake Tribune).

-- SkyWest: More help wanted (Tribune).

-- Cedar City struggling with Mesa Air Group (St. George Spectrum).

-- New east-west freeway in valley? (Deseret Morning News).

-- Local officials pushing for road funds (Morning News).

 


HNTB is a multidisciplinary firm known and respected for our work in transportation, bridges, aviation, architecture, urban design and planning, environmental engineering, water and construction services. We serve our clients with integrity, technical excellence and a commitment to performance— providing quality work, on time, on budget and to the client's satisfaction.

At HNTB, we're committed to providing an environment where our people can be successful, and where they can create infrastructure that exceeds the expectations of our clients and the communities they serve. Through exceptional service and a shared vision, we create public infrastructure that unites, enriches and inspires.

Visit HNTB's website here.



Utah Transportation Watch is a service of Utah Policy.com